Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in Federal Criminal Cases
Published By:

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in Federal Criminal Cases

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) is a federal law enacted in 1986 to address computer-related crimes such as hacking, unauthorized access to computer systems, and the theft or destruction of electronic data. Since its inception, the CFAA has been used to prosecute various computer-related crimes in federal criminal cases. This blog post will take a closer look at the CFAA and its application in federal criminal cases.

The CFAA makes accessing a computer system without authorization or exceeding authorized access illegal. It also prohibits the theft or destruction of electronic data and the distribution of malicious software or “malware” that can be used to compromise computer systems. Violations of the CFAA can result in criminal charges and significant penalties, including fines, imprisonment, and forfeiture of assets.


Hacking and the CFAA: A Powerful Tool for Prosecution


One of the key features of the CFAA is its broad definition of “computer.” The law defines a computer as any electronic device storing or processing data, including desktop computers, laptops, smartphones, tablets, and even electronic voting machines. This broad definition has allowed prosecutors to apply the CFAA to various computer-related crimes, including cyberstalking, identity theft, and intellectual property theft.

The CFAA has also been used to prosecute individuals and organizations that engage in “hacking” activities. Hacking involves accessing a computer system without authorization, often to steal or manipulate data. Hacking can be used for various purposes, including financial gain, political activism, and espionage. The CFAA provides law enforcement with a powerful tool to investigate and prosecute these types of crimes, including those committed by foreign actors.

In addition to its criminal provisions, the CFAA includes civil remedies for victims of computer-related crimes. Victims can sue individuals or organizations that have violated the CFAA for damages, including lost profits, repairing or replacing computer systems and other costs associated with the theft or destruction of electronic data. These civil remedies can be used to compensate victims for their losses and deter future criminal activity.


Reforming the CFAA: The Proposed Aaron’s Law Amendment


However, the CFAA has been criticized by some legal scholars and civil liberties advocates for its broad and ambiguous language. Critics argue that the law’s definition of “exceeding authorized access” is vague and could be interpreted to include innocent conduct, such as violating a website’s terms of service. Others have raised concerns about the law’s potential impact on free speech and privacy rights, particularly in cases involving the distribution of information that is considered sensitive or controversial.


Reforming the CFAA: The Proposed Aaron's Law Amendment

In recent years, efforts have been to reform the CFAA to address some of these concerns. In 2013, a proposed amendment to the CFAA, known as “Aaron’s Law,” was introduced in Congress. The law was named after Aaron Swartz, a computer programmer and political activist who committed suicide while facing charges under the CFAA for allegedly downloading academic articles without permission. The proposed amendment sought to narrow the scope of the CFAA and limit its potential impact on free speech and privacy rights.


Understanding and Complying with the CFAA


The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act is a powerful tool for federal law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute computer-related crimes. However, the law’s broad and ambiguous language has raised concerns about its potential impact on civil liberties and free speech. The CFAA will likely be further tested in the courts and Congress as technology evolves. It is important for individuals and organizations to be aware of the CFAA’s provisions and to take steps to ensure that they comply with the law to avoid potential criminal and civil liability.



About the Author:


Christopher Keyser is an AV-Preeminent rated criminal and DWI defense attorney based in Minneapolis who is known for fighting aggressively for his clients and utilizing innovative tactics to get the most positive results. He has been featured in numerous media outlets due to the breadth and depth of his knowledge and has been named a Certified Specialist in Criminal Law by the Minnesota Bar Association. Mr. Keyser is Lead Counsel rated, and he has received recognition for his criminal law work from Avvo, Expertise, Super Lawyers, The National Trial Lawyers, and more.

If You Need a Top Minnesota Criminal Lawyer Call 312-338-5007



With offices in Minneapolis and Stillwater, Minnesota, Keyser Law, P.A. handles cases throughout the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area including:




Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Chanhassen, Corcoran, Crystal, Dayton, Deephaven, Eden Prairie, Edina, Excelsior, Golden Valley, Greenfield, Greenwood, Hanover, Hopkins, Independence, Long Lake, Loretto, Maple Grove, Maple Plain, Medicine Lake, Medina, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, Minnetrista, Mound, New Hope, Orono, Osseo, Plymouth, Richfield, Robbinsdale, Rockford, Rogers, Shorewood, Spring Park, St. Anthony Village, St. Bonifacius, St. Louis Park, Wayzata, Woodland and Hassan Township.



Afton, Bayport, Birchwood Village, Cottage Grove, Dellwood, Forest Lake, Grant, Hugo, Lake Elmo, Lake St. Croix Beach, Lakeland Shores, Lakeland, Landfall, Mahtomedi, Marine on St. Croix, Newport, Oak Park Heights, Oakdale, Pine Springs, Scandia, St. Marys Point, St. Paul Park, Stillwater, Willernie, White Bear Lake, Woodbury, Baytown, Denmark, Grey Cloud Island, May, West Lakeland, Garen and Point Douglas.


Arden Hills, Blaine, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Maplewood, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North St. Paul, Roseville, Shoreview, St. Anthony, St. Paul, Spring Lake Park, Vadnais Heights, White Bear Lake and White Bear Lake Township.


Andover, Anoka, Bethel, Blaine, Centerville, Circle Pines, Columbia Heights, Columbus, Coon Rapids, East Bethel, Fridley, Ham Lake, Hilltop, Lexington, Lino Lakes, Nowthen, Oak Grove, Ramsey and St. Francis.


Apple Valley, Burnsville, Coates, Eagan, Farmington, Hampton, Hastings, Inver Grove Heights, Lakeville, Lilydale, Mendota, Mendota Heights, Miesville, New Trier, Northfield, Randolph, Rosemount, South St. Paul, Sunfish Lake, Vermillion and West St. Paul.