CASE EVALUATION FORM

*Required

Name*
First Last
Email*
Phone*
How Did You Find Us?
What City / County Are Charges in?
How Can We Help?
Captcha

(612) 338-5007

Contact Us

Minnesota Criminal Defense Law Firm

Keyser Law, P.A. has two convenient locations in the metro area. Our main office is located downtown Minneapolis on the corner of Fourth Avenue and Fourth Street. We are east of the U.S. Federal Courthouse, north of the Public Safety Facility (jail) and northeast of Minneapolis City Hall. Our Stillwater office is located in the historic downtown area along the beautiful St. Croix River. We are available to meet at other locations if you are unable to travel to one of our offices. Simply call us to schedule a meeting.

MINNEAPOLIS LOCATION

400 South 4th Street
Suite 806M
Minneapolis, MN 55415

(612) 338-5007

chris@keyserdefense.com

STILLWATER LOCATION

118 Chestnut Street East
Stillwater, MN 55082

(651) 689-4788

chris@keyserdefense.com

CASE EVALUATION FORM

*Required

Name*
First Last
Email*
Phone*
How Did You Find Us?
What City / County Are Charges in?
How Can We Help?
Captcha

Third Degree DWI
(State v. KD)

Client charged with two counts of DWI, possession of marijuana in a motor vehicle, and possession of drug paraphernalia. His first DWI incid

Client charged with two counts of DWI, possession of marijuana in a motor vehicle, and possession of drug paraphernalia. His first DWI incident was just two years prior (we did not represent him on the first DWI). Through negotiation, client pleaded guilty to misdemeanor careless driving. The DWI charges and drug charges were dismissed. Client served no jail, no community service, and is on unsupervised probation.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

3rd Degree DWI Reduced to Careless Driving - No Jail Time
Domestic Assault
(State v. RR)

Client pleaded guilty to and was convicted of domestic assault. Since his conviction, he turned his life around by earning a GED,

Client pleaded guilty to and was convicted of domestic assault. Since his conviction, he turned his life around by earning a GED, Associate’s Degree, Bachelor’s Degree, and finally a Master’s Degree. The court granted our petition to seal his domestic assault conviction in Olmsted County. Client gets a clean slate.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Felony Drug Possession
(State v. AM)

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for felony drug possession was granted in Dakota County. Client is able to get a fresh

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for felony drug possession was granted in Dakota County. Client is able to get a fresh start.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Prostutition
(State v. AV)

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor solicitation of prostitution was granted in Ramsey County. Client is a

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor solicitation of prostitution was granted in Ramsey County. Client is able to get a fresh start and apply for jobs and housing without having this blemish on file.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Domestic Assault
(State v. NW)

We got Client's domestic assault charges dismissed. Our petition to then seal Client’s record was granted in Washington County.

We got Client’s domestic assault charges dismissed. Our petition to then seal Client’s record was granted in Washington County.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Wrongfully Obtaining Public Assistance (Welfare Fraud)
(State v. SD)

Client had convictions for wrongfully obtaining public assistance, disorderly conduct, and damage to property that were holding he

Client had convictions for wrongfully obtaining public assistance, disorderly conduct, and damage to property that were holding her back. Our petitions to seal all records were granted in Ramsey County.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Theft (4 separate convictions)
(State v. NP)

Our petition to seal Client’s FOURT separate theft convictions for shoplifting were granted in Hennepin County. We convinced th

Our petition to seal Client’s FOURT separate theft convictions for shoplifting were granted in Hennepin County. We convinced the court that Client was young and immature but has since become a positive, law-abiding citizen with goals of becoming a nurse.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Felony Drug Possession
(State v. JM)

We secured a dismissal of our Client's felony drug possession charge through her completion of a diversion program. Our petition

We secured a dismissal of our Client’s felony drug possession charge through her completion of a diversion program. Our petition to then seal Client’s record was granted in Washington County. Client is able to get clean slate and a fresh start.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Shoplifting
(State v. SH)

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor theft was granted in Hennepin County. Client is able to get a fresh st

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor theft was granted in Hennepin County. Client is able to get a fresh start and apply for jobs and housing without having this blemish on file.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Disorderly Conduct
(State v. JF)

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor disorderly conduct was granted in Ramsey County. Client is able to get

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor disorderly conduct was granted in Ramsey County. Client is able to get a fresh start and apply for jobs and housing without having this blemish on file.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Shoplifting
(State v. IC)

Our petition to seal Client’s dismissed misdemeanor theft charge was granted in Hennepin County. Client is able to get a fresh

Our petition to seal Client’s dismissed misdemeanor theft charge was granted in Hennepin County. Client is able to get a fresh start and apply for jobs and housing without having this blemish on file.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Misdemeanor Theft
(State v. CG)

We got Client's misdemeanor theft charge dismissed. Our petition to then seal Client’s dismissed record was granted in Washingt

We got Client’s misdemeanor theft charge dismissed. Our petition to then seal Client’s dismissed record was granted in Washington County.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Terroristic Threats (Threats of Violence)
(State v. TT)

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for gross misdemeanor threats of violence (terroristic threats) was granted in Ramsey

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for gross misdemeanor threats of violence (terroristic threats) was granted in Ramsey County. Client got a second chance and was able to start fresh in the job market.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Careless Driving
(State v. PD)

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor careless driving (amended from an original DWI charge) was granted in

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor careless driving (amended from an original DWI charge) was granted in Ramsey County. Client is able to get a fresh start and apply for jobs and housing without having this blemish on file.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Domestic Assault
(State v. SK)

Our petition to seal Client’s dismissed charges for misdemeanor domestic assault was granted in Isanti County. Client is able t

Our petition to seal Client’s dismissed charges for misdemeanor domestic assault was granted in Isanti County. Client is able to get a fresh start.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Gross Misdemeanor Property Damage
(State v. KJ)

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for gross misdemeanor damage to property conviction was granted in Hennepin County. Cl

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for gross misdemeanor damage to property conviction was granted in Hennepin County. Client is able to get a fresh start and apply for jobs and housing without having this blemish on file.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Domestic Assault
(State v. HB)

We got Client's domestic assault charges dismissed and then petitioned to have them sealed from public view. Our petition was g

We got Client’s domestic assault charges dismissed and then petitioned to have them sealed from public view. Our petition was granted in Hennepin County. Client was not only vindicated by having the charges dismissed but now has the benefit of a clean slate on background checks.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Domestic Assault
(State v. AM)

We got Client's domestic assault charge dismissed in St. Louis County. We then filed for an expungement to seal Client's record

We got Client’s domestic assault charge dismissed in St. Louis County. We then filed for an expungement to seal Client’s record that was granted. Client’s job in the health field was not affected.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Felony Theft
(State v. TL)

Our received a stay of adjudication on a felony theft charge in Carver County. Once the charge was dismissed, we petitioned to s

Our received a stay of adjudication on a felony theft charge in Carver County. Once the charge was dismissed, we petitioned to seal Client’s record and the court granted our petition. Client is able to get a clean slate with no felony on record.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Marijuana Possession & Minor Consumption
(State v. AQ)

Our petition to seal Client’s convictions for petty misdemeanor marijuana possession and misdemeanor minor consumption (underage

Our petition to seal Client’s convictions for petty misdemeanor marijuana possession and misdemeanor minor consumption (underage drinking) was granted in Blue Earth County. Client is able to get a fresh start and apply for jobs and housing without having this blemish on file.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Falsely Reporting a Crime
(State v. AK)

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor falsely reporting a crime was granted in Dakota County. We convinced t

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor falsely reporting a crime was granted in Dakota County. We convinced the court that client has turned his life around and deserved to have this record sealed from public view.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Marijuana Possession and Drug Paraphernalia
(State v. NC)

Client had petty misdemeanor convictions for possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia in Le Sueur and Nicollet

Client had petty misdemeanor convictions for possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia in Le Sueur and Nicollet Counties. Our petitions to seal Client’s convictions were both granted.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungements GRANTED
Domestic Assault
(State v. KB)

We got client's domestic assault charge dismissed. We then filed for an expungement that was granted in St. Louis County (Dulut

We got client’s domestic assault charge dismissed. We then filed for an expungement that was granted in St. Louis County (Duluth). Client was able to seal her public record so that it would not affect her nursing career.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Misdemeanor Hit & Run
(State v. AA)

We successfully obtained a dismissal for our client's misdemeanor hit and run charge. We then filed for an expungement. Our pe

We successfully obtained a dismissal for our client’s misdemeanor hit and run charge. We then filed for an expungement. Our petition to seal Client’s dismissed record conviction was granted in Ramsey County.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Fifth Degree Assault
(State v. GG)

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor assault conviction was granted in Hennepin County. A clean slate for o

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor assault conviction was granted in Hennepin County. A clean slate for our client.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Third Degree Burglary
(State v. PW)

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for gross misdemeanor burglar conviction was granted in Hennepin County.

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for gross misdemeanor burglar conviction was granted in Hennepin County.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Misdemeanor Prostitution
(State v. AV)

Our petition to seal Client's conviction for misdemeanor prostitution conviction was granted in Ramsey County. Client is able to

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor prostitution conviction was granted in Ramsey County. Client is able to get a fresh start and apply for jobs and housing without having this blemish on file.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Misdemeanor Domestic Assault
(State v. PA)

Our petition to seal Client's conviction for misdemeanor domestic assault conviction was granted in Hennepin County. Client is ab

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor domestic assault conviction was granted in Hennepin County. Client is able to get a fresh start and apply for jobs and housing without having this blemish on file.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Criminal Damage to Property
(State v. DR)

Our petition to seal Client's conviction for misdemeanor criminal damage to property conviction was granted in Hennepin County. C

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor criminal damage to property conviction was granted in Hennepin County. Client is able to get a fresh start and apply for jobs and housing without having this blemish on file.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Misdemeanor Prostitution
(State v. AV)

Our petition to seal Client's conviction for misdemeanor prostitution conviction was granted in Ramsey County. Client is able to

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor prostitution conviction was granted in Ramsey County. Client is able to get a fresh start and apply for jobs and housing without having this blemish on file.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Misdemeanor Domestic Assault
(State v. CP)

Our petition to seal Client's conviction for misdemeanor domestic assault conviction was granted in Washington County. Client is

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for misdemeanor domestic assault conviction was granted in Washington County. Client is able to get a fresh start and apply for jobs and housing without having this blemish on file.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Petty Misdemeanor Theft
(State v. DJ)

Our petition to seal Client's conviction for petty misdemeanor theft was granted. Client able to get a fresh start and apply for

Our petition to seal Client’s conviction for petty misdemeanor theft was granted. Client able to get a fresh start and apply for jobs without having this blemish on file.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Expungement GRANTED
Domestic Assault – Fear & Harm
(State v. MS)

Client charged with two counts of domestic assault and one count of disorderly conduct. The State demanded a guilty plea and conviction for domestic assault. Th

Client charged with two counts of domestic assault and one count of disorderly conduct. The State demanded a guilty plea and conviction for domestic assault. The Client took his case to trial and we convinced the jury he was not guilty of domestic assault. The jury convicted Client of disorderly conduct. The case sent a clear message to the prosecution that when they offer nothing, we will take a case to trial and force them to prove their case. Here, the client got a better outcomes after a jury trial than if he pleaded guilty pre-trial.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY on two counts of Domestic Assault
Obstruction of Process & Disorderly Conduct
(State v. OH)

Client was charged with being disorderly and interfering with police duties. His car was being towed for being parked illegally. The Client disputed this and an

Client was charged with being disorderly and interfering with police duties. His car was being towed for being parked illegally. The Client disputed this and an argument started. When the police arrived, the Client tried explaining his side but the police wouldn’t listen. They grabbed him and forced him to the ground in handcuffs. At trial, the jury agreed the Client was not disorderly, and that the police overstepped their bounds.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY on all counts
Fifth Degree Assault & Disorderly Conduct
(State v. MI)

Client was accused of brawling and assaulting a co-worker. At trial, through skilled cross-examination, the alleged victim was called out on her inconsistencies

Client was accused of brawling and assaulting a co-worker. At trial, through skilled cross-examination, the alleged victim was called out on her inconsistencies and lies. The jury acquitted the Client of all counts.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY on all counts
Domestic Assault & Disorderly Conduct
(State v. MB)

Client was charged with domestic assault, accused of abusing his girlfriend. The Client maintained his innocence from the beginning. Despite "he said, she said"

Client was charged with domestic assault, accused of abusing his girlfriend. The Client maintained his innocence from the beginning. Despite “he said, she said” evidence that was shaky, the prosecutor demanded the case go to trial, and even added on more charges out of spite. The Client faced three separate charges going to trial but refused to back down. The jury found the State’s case not credible and acquitted the Client after only 30 minutes of deliberation.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY on all counts
Fifth Degree Assault, Damage to Property & Disorderly Conduct
(State v. BS)

Client was accused of being drunk, disorderly, assaulting another person, and breaking a cell phone. Despite eyewitness accounts that the Client did not do thes

Client was accused of being drunk, disorderly, assaulting another person, and breaking a cell phone. Despite eyewitness accounts that the Client did not do these things, the State demanded the Client plead guilty. We refused. After a three-day trial, the jury found the Client NOT GUILTY on all counts after 15 minutes of deliberation. We successfully cross-examined the police officers and exposed their biases against the Client.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY on all counts
Third Degree & Fourth Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct
(State v. AM)

Client was charged with sexually abusing multiple victims in a massage therapy studio. The case's main issue was whether the Client's massage technique was indu

Client was charged with sexually abusing multiple victims in a massage therapy studio. The case’s main issue was whether the Client’s massage technique was industry standard or crossed the line into inappropriate. At trial, the Client was found NOT GUILTY of three counts: Third Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct and two counts of Fourth Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct. The Client was found guilty of two other counts. By fighting his charges, Client avoided a conviction of the most serious charge and received only 30 days of jail rather than going to prison.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY of Third Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct

NOT GUILTY of Fourth Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct (2 counts)
Fifth Degree Assault & Disorderly Conduct
(State v. BS)

Client was accused of punching a girl in Minneapolis after a long night of drinking and being disorderly in the streets. The alleged victim's account to police

Client was accused of punching a girl in Minneapolis after a long night of drinking and being disorderly in the streets. The alleged victim’s account to police was not believable. Rather than accept the fact it’s case was weak, the State demanded the Client plead guilty. We refused. At trial, the Client testified and told the jury he never committed these crimes. The alleged victim testified and we successfully cross-examined her, causing the jury to doubt her claims and ultimately find the Client NOT GUILTY on all counts.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY on all counts
Third Degree & Fifth Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct
(State v. TW)

Client was charged with Third Degree and Fifth Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct. He was accused of rape. The Client proclaimed his innocence from the beginning bu

Client was charged with Third Degree and Fifth Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct. He was accused of rape. The Client proclaimed his innocence from the beginning but the State refused to listen. The prosecution wanted a felony conviction and sex offender registration for our client. We refused. At trial, we successfully showcased all of the State’s weaknesses and poked holes in the prosecution’s case theory. The jury found the alleged victim not credible and acquitted the Client on of all charges.

Client avoids a felony conviction and does not have to register as a predatory sex offender.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY on all counts
Felony Threats of Violence & Felony Domestic Assault by Strangulation
(State v. PW)

Client was charged with felony threats of violence, felony domestic assault by strangulation, and domestic assault. The State demanded the Client plead guilty t

Client was charged with felony threats of violence, felony domestic assault by strangulation, and domestic assault. The State demanded the Client plead guilty to a felony and serve jail time. We refused. A jury found the Client NOT GUILTY of both felony counts but convicted of the domestic assault charge. The Client avoided a felony conviction – a far better outcome than what the State pushed for.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY of Felony Threats of Terror

NOT GUILTY of Felony Domestic Assault by Strangulation
Fourth Degree DWI
(State v. JR)

Client was charged with Fourth Degree DWI (driving under the influence) and Fourth Degree DWI (operating with a blood-alcohol concentration over .08). The Clien

Client was charged with Fourth Degree DWI (driving under the influence) and Fourth Degree DWI (operating with a blood-alcohol concentration over .08). The Client’s blood-alcohol test was a .11 – well over the .08 legal limit. The prosecutor’s offer to resolve the case was unreasonable so we took the case to trial. A jury found the Client NOT GUILTY of all counts. We successfully convinced the jury that the State’s evidence was weak, the arresting officer was not entirely credible, and the breath test was not proven to be reliable.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY on all counts
Obstruction of Legal Process and Disorderly Conduct
(State v. OH)

Client was charged with Obstruction of Legal Process (Resisting Arrest) and Disorderly Conduct in Minneapolis. The client's car was being towed and he confronte

Client was charged with Obstruction of Legal Process (Resisting Arrest) and Disorderly Conduct in Minneapolis. The client’s car was being towed and he confronted the tow truck driver about it. The client became upset and police claimed they repeatedly told the client to calm down and walk away, but he didn’t. The State alleged that the client was being aggressive towards others, loud, causing a scene, and resisted police when being arrested. We convinced the jury that it’s not illegal to be loud or upset and that the client’s actions were not criminal. The jury agreed and deliberated for less than one hour before acquitting our client.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY of Obstruction of Legal Process

NOT GUILTY of Disorderly Conduct
Fifth Degree Assault and Disorderly Conduct / Brawling
(State v. MI)

Client was charged with Fifth Degree Assault and Disorderly Conduct after fighting with a co-worker in St. Paul. We asserted a self-defense claim. Through cross

Client was charged with Fifth Degree Assault and Disorderly Conduct after fighting with a co-worker in St. Paul. We asserted a self-defense claim. Through cross-examination at trial, the alleged victim was caught in numerous inconsistencies and found unreliable. We also convinced the jury that the police made several assumptions about our client and failed to complete a thorough investigation. The jury deliberated for less than one hour.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY of Fifth Degree Assault (Harm)

NOT GUILTY of Disorderly Conduct (Brawling)
Domestic Assault and Disorderly Conduct
(State v. MB)

Client was charged with two counts of domestic assault and one count of disorderly conduct. This case was unique because the alleged victim (client's significan

Client was charged with two counts of domestic assault and one count of disorderly conduct. This case was unique because the alleged victim (client’s significant other) did not testify at trial. The State relied on a 911 call and client’s admission of guilt to police. At trial we successfully cross-examined the police officers to show they were biased and did not complete a fair investigation in the case. The jury deliberated for less than one hour.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY of Domestic Assault (Fear)

NOT GUILTY of Domestic Assault (Harm)

NOT GUILTY of Disorderly Conduct (Fighting)
Assault, Criminal Damage to Property, Disorderly Conduct
(State v. BS)

Client was charged with assaulting a security guard, breaking the guard's phone, and being disorderly in public. We rejected all State offers for Client to plea

Client was charged with assaulting a security guard, breaking the guard’s phone, and being disorderly in public. We rejected all State offers for Client to plead guilty and proceeded to trial. After 45 minutes of deliberation, the jury unanimously found Client not guilty of all charges.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY of Assault

NOT GUILTY of Criminal Damage to Property

NOT GUILTY of Disorderly Conduct
Fifth Degree Misdemeanor Assault and Disorderly Conduct
(State v. TA)

Client was charged with two counts of assault and one count of disorderly conduct for allegedly assaulting a female in the street after bar close. The alleged v

Client was charged with two counts of assault and one count of disorderly conduct for allegedly assaulting a female in the street after bar close. The alleged victim and the State’s independent eyewitness were shown to be unreliable after cross examination at trial and the jury acquitted client of all charges.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY of Fifth Degree Assault

NOT GUILTY of Fifth Degree Assault

NOT GUILTY of Disorderly Conduct
Felony Criminal Sexual Conduct
(State v. AM)

Client was charged with five counts of felony criminal sexual conduct for inappropriately touching massage clients without permission. If the client was convict

Client was charged with five counts of felony criminal sexual conduct for inappropriately touching massage clients without permission. If the client was convicted of Third Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct, he would face a mandatory prison sentence. The case proceeded to jury trial and client was acquitted of three charges, including the most serious charge. Client was convicted of two lesser charges and avoided prison.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY of Third Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct

NOT GUILTY of Fourth Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct

NOT GUILTY of Fourth Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct
Fourth Degree Misdemeanor DWI
(State v. AL)

Client was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol. The State refused to negotiate the case so we proceeded to a jury trial.

Client was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol. The State refused to negotiate the case so we proceeded to a jury trial.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

NOT GUILTY of Fourth Degree DWI
Felony Second Degree Burglary
(State v. CM)

Client was charged with breaking into a garage and stealing a bicycle. Through our own investigation, we discovered client knew the homeowners and had been to t

Client was charged with breaking into a garage and stealing a bicycle. Through our own investigation, we discovered client knew the homeowners and had been to that residence on previous occasions. Despite client not having clear permission to enter the home, we fought the case and refused to accept any plea offers.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Case Dismissed
Felony Third Degree Assault
(State v. EB)

Client was charged with felony assault for allegedly attacking and biting a person's ear, causing surgery and reconstructive surgery. Client claimed self-defens

Client was charged with felony assault for allegedly attacking and biting a person’s ear, causing surgery and reconstructive surgery. Client claimed self-defense after being attacked by the alleged victim but the State wasn’t convicned. We rejected all plea offers and proceeded to trial.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Case Dismissed at Trial
Gross Misdemeanor Obstuction of Legal Process with Force
(State v. GH)

Client was charged with resisting arrest and fighting with police officers. The police entered client's home on a welfare check, arguably without permission and

Client was charged with resisting arrest and fighting with police officers. The police entered client’s home on a welfare check, arguably without permission and being hostile towards client. He felt the police were abusing their power and resisted their attempts to arrest him for peacefully being in his own home. We rejected all State offers to plea bargain and proceeded to trial.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Case Dismissed
Felony First Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct
(State v. NH)

Client was charged with sexually abusing underage relatives. The evidence against the client was strong and if found guilty at trial, client would have served 2

Client was charged with sexually abusing underage relatives. The evidence against the client was strong and if found guilty at trial, client would have served 24 years in prison. Through aggressive negotiations abd obtaining defense expert witness opinions, we pushed the case forward and resolved the morning of trial.

Tweet
Share
Share
Buffer

Probation Only (Client avoided 24 years in prison)
Misdemeanor Obstruction of Legal Process
(State v. RH)

Client was charged with misdemeanor "obstruction of justice" for allegedly failing to comply with police officers' commands. Our opinion is that the police and

Client was charged with misdemeanor “obstruction of justice” for allegedly failing to comply with police officers’ commands. Our opinion is that the police and prosecution routinely abuse their authority by charging citizens for criminal conduct that was actually lawful. We argued that client had a right to be free from police intrusion and that his freedom was improperly restricted. We rejected all offers for plea bargaining and proceeded to trial.

Tweet
Share66
Share
Buffer

Case Dismissed

Minnesota HRO vs OFP: What’s the Difference?

JAN. 20 2022

Published By: Chris Keyser

Domestic violence in Minnesota is taken very seriously. Because of the extent the law goes to protect those who are at risk of domestic violence, there are two ways that the court can address harassment: harassment restraining orders and orders for protection.

These two different types of legal remedies for people at risk share much in common, but there are many differences between them, too. These differences often lead to confusion among those who are...
Is There a Difference between Drunk and Drugged Driving in MN?

JAN. 16 2022

Published By: Chris Keyser

If you are charged in Minnesota with drugged driving, you may be wondering if the possible penalties or charges you face are less severe than driving under the influence of alcohol. Well, not to be the bearer of bad news, but that’s unfortunately not the case.

In some states, there is a legal distinction between drunk and drugged driving, but in Minnesota, there is no distinction. A DWI, the charge faced by most people under the influence of drugs while...

MINNEAPOLIS & ST. PAUL CRIMINAL DEFENSE & DWI LAW FIRM SERVING

With offices in Minneapolis and Stillwater, Minnesota, Keyser Law, P.A. handles cases throughout the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area including:

HENNEPIN COUNTY

Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Chanhassen, Corcoran, Crystal, Dayton, Deephaven, Eden Prairie, Edina, Excelsior, Golden Valley, Greenfield, Greenwood, Hanover, Hopkins, Independence, Long Lake, Loretto, Maple Grove, Maple Plain, Medicine Lake, Medina, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, Minnetrista, Mound, New Hope, Orono, Osseo, Plymouth, Richfield, Robbinsdale, Rockford, Rogers, Shorewood, Spring Park, St. Anthony Village, St. Bonifacius, St. Louis Park, Wayzata, Woodland and Hassan Township.

WASHINGTON COUNTY

Afton, Bayport, Birchwood Village, Cottage Grove, Dellwood, Forest Lake, Grant, Hugo, Lake Elmo, Lake St. Croix Beach, Lakeland Shores, Lakeland, Landfall, Mahtomedi, Marine on St. Croix, Newport, Oak Park Heights, Oakdale, Pine Springs, Scandia, St. Marys Point, St. Paul Park, Stillwater, Willernie, White Bear Lake, Woodbury, Baytown, Denmark, Grey Cloud Island, May, West Lakeland, Garen and Point Douglas.

RAMSEY COUNTY

Arden Hills, Blaine, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Maplewood, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North St. Paul, Roseville, Shoreview, St. Anthony, St. Paul, Spring Lake Park, Vadnais Heights, White Bear Lake and White Bear Lake Township.

ANOKA COUNTY

Andover, Anoka, Bethel, Blaine, Centerville, Circle Pines, Columbia Heights, Columbus, Coon Rapids, East Bethel, Fridley, Ham Lake, Hilltop, Lexington, Lino Lakes, Nowthen, Oak Grove, Ramsey and St. Francis.

DAKOTA COUNTY

Apple Valley, Burnsville, Coates, Eagan, Farmington, Hampton, Hastings, Inver Grove Heights, Lakeville, Lilydale, Mendota, Mendota Heights, Miesville, New Trier, Northfield, Randolph, Rosemount, South St. Paul, Sunfish Lake, Vermillion and West St. Paul.

MINNEAPOLIS

STILLWATER